Wrigley Jr. Company Essay

Are you struggling with an essay?
We know how to write it quickly and perfectly!

order now

1. 0 Introduction
In June 2002 Blanka Dobrynin. a pull offing manager of Aurora Borealis hedge fund. considers the possible additions from increasing the debt capitalisation of The Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company. Blanka suggests Wrigley raise the sum of $ 3 billion in debt of the capitalisation while Wrigley has been cautiously financed and remained no debt at the terminal of 2001. This study is taking to analyse whether Wrigley should utilize $ 3 billion debt recapitalization to either pay dividends or to buy back portions.

2. 0 Current Capital Structure

By and large. houses can take among assorted capital constructions in order to maximise overall market value of the company. It is proposed nevertheless. that Wrigley issues $ 3 billion in debt.

Harmonizing to the tradeoff theory. the optimum capital construction does be ( Kraus and Litzenberger. 1973 ) . The higher degree of debt may increase both bankruptcy and fiscal cost that lead the house to travel or avoid bankruptcy. However. there are several advantages of raising debt capital. First. tax-deductions which decrease the cost of debt. Second. shareholders do non hold to portion the net income when the house has excess. as debt holders are limited to their fixed return. Finally. shareholders do have voting right but debt holders do non which means the shareholders are commanding the concern.

3. 0 The Impacts of Proposed Changes

The determination to increase $ 3 billion debt capitalisation of the Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company by Blanka Dobrynin is to optimise the entire value of the company. Firms are frequently inclined to take debt over equity in order to utilize the revenue enhancement shield.

As the increasing of $ 3 billion debt in Wrigley’s capital construction. its equity value will increase by $ 1. 2 billion due to the revenue enhancement shield. Besides this proposal of recapitalization will assist Wrigley’s equity lessening by merely $ 1. 8 billion when they payout $ 3 billion debt. due to the offset by the $ 1. 2 billion revenue enhancement shield.

Harmonizing to our computations. through recapitalization Wrigley’s entire plus will be $ 14. 459. 826. which consists of $ 3. 157. 127 debt and $ 11. 302. 699 equity. In general. houses prefer to maintain a higher degree of debt/equity ratio to obtain larger entire capital to increase the firm’s entire value. But it is obvious that more debt means more hazard and more payout.

By measuring the spreadsheet. it suggests several grounds for and against the acquisition of debt. If the Wrigley’s debt additions. its recognition evaluation will drop from AAA to BB. which leads to more cost of future funding and value of stocks.

However. as debt can increase house value up to a grade. we recommend that Wrigley’s find an optimum capital construction through farther analysis of whether $ 3 billion of debt provides the smallest possible Leaden Average Cost of Capital ( WACC ) for the house.

3. 1 Flexibility and Militias

Harmonizing to Denis ( 2011 ) . fiscal flexibleness is the ability of a house to do determinations and manage jobs seasonably. Furthermore. the house should ever maximise their house value on any unexpected alterations in investing chance and hard currency flows of the house. In add-on. the house should providentially raise their capital in the good times to avoid stretching their capablenesss excessively far. and in order to continue their ability to take to either borrow or issue equity in future times of demand. Therefore. the lower degree of firm’s debt. the more fiscal flexibleness a house has ( Investopedia. 2014 ) .

Due to that $ 3 billion new debt existing. the fiscal flexibleness of Wrigley will worsen ; this fiscal activity leads to take down ability to borrow money in the hereafter if there are any profitable investing chances or any unexpected internal or external dazes.

3. 2 The Book and Market Price per Share

As is seeable from the Appendix One. the determination of how to utilize the financess raised through debt is an of import one as it will impact both the monetary value per portion and the book value per portion. The monetary value per portion will diminish to $ 48. 63 if the debt raised is used to pay out a dividend ( lessening in the value of equity ) . whereas the monetary value per portion will increase to $ 61. 53 if it is used to buy back portions. However. the issue of debt can hold signalling effects for investors. By and large. when houses issue debt it signals to investors that the house is in a good fiscal state of affairs as the house is able to set about refunds of future involvement.

Furthermore. the clientele consequence can impact the stock monetary value because it assumes that the investors are attracted to the company for its policies and when these change the investors will respond and set their stock consequently ( Moles & A ; Terry. 2005 ) . In add-on to this. the issue of debt and redemption of stock could signal to investors that directors believe the stock in undervalued.

Despite this alteration in monetary value. the Leaden Average Cost of Capital ( WACC ) will give a more accurate representation of what the alteration in capital construction implies for the house. by taking history the costs of debt.

3. 3 Leaden Average Cost of Capital

Before recapitalisation Wrigley’s WACC was equal to it’s cost of equity ( ke ) . which was calculated at 10. 95 % . After capitalization it was found that Wrigley’s WACC decreased to 10. 29 % . This follows the general form of increasing debt resulting in a lower WACC. The cost of debt ( kd ) rate of 13 % was used after we assessed the cardinal industrial fiscal ratios and compared them with that of Wrigley’s ( See Appendix 2 ) to reason that it was in the scope between the BB rate of 12. 753 % and B 14. 663 % ( see Appendices 3 & A ; 4 ) . Although WACC has decreased. which means that every $ 1 that Wrigley raises in capital from investors it must pay at least $ 10. 30 in return. it’s Beta has increased from 0. 75 to 0. 87. This means that Wrigley’s investing is still less volatile than the market. but it has become more in line with the market after recapitalisation. However Beta will non integrate the hazard of fiscal hurt that becomes present one time Wrigley have taken out the debt. 4. 0 Conclusions and Recommendations

Therefore. from our analysis we know that an addition in debt can hold inauspicious affects on flexibleness and can hold costs associated such as bankruptcy. bureau and hurt costs. nevertheless. due to the revenue enhancement shield affects and the lessening in WACC we believe there should an addition in the degree of debt. In add-on. the portion monetary value alteration is non consistent with the alteration in WACC and it could be assumed that the hurt costs associated with the addition in debt would intend the monetary value would really stay comparatively steady to reflect the negligible alteration. We recommend that Wrigley publish $ 3 billion of debt in the signifier of portion redemption program because this scenario has no specifying impact upon WACC – somewhat diminishing from 10. 95 % to 10. 29 % . and as a company’s chief end is to increase its’ stockholders value. Furthermore there are fewer hazards in footings of patronage consequence and signalling consequence. while besides leting the Wrigley household to keep their control with their high part of portions. However. we recommend farther analysis to find what is the optimum degree of debt by happening the lowest possible WACC. and hence maximizing the company’s value.

5. 0 Reference List
DeAngelo. H. . DeAngelo. L. . & A ; Whited T. M. . ( 2011 ) Capital construction kineticss and ephemeral debt. Journal of Financial Economics. 99. 235–261.

Denis. D J. ( 2011 ) Financial flexibleness and corporate liquidness. Journal of Corporate Finance. 17 ( 3 ) . 667-674.

Franco Modigliani ; Merton H. Miller. ( Jun. . 1958 )
The American Economic Review. Vol. 48. No. 3. . pp. 261-297.

Investopedia. ( 2014 ) . Complete Guide To Corporate Finance. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. investopedia. com/walkthrough/corporate-finance/5/capital-structure/capital-structure. aspx

Investopedia ( 2014 ) . Optimum Capital Structure. [ ONLINE ] Available at: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. investopedia. com/terms/o/optimal-capital-structure. asp. [ Last Accessed 19 Aug 2014 ] .

Kraus. A. and R. Litzenberger ( 1973 ) . A State-Preference theoretical account of optimum fiscal purchase. Journal of Finance. Vol. 28. pp. 911-922.

Gram molecules. P. . Terry. N. ( 2005 ) . Clientele consequence. The Handbook of International Finance Footings. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //www. oxfordreference. com. ezp01. library. qut. edu. au/view/10. 1093/acref/9780198294818. 001. 0001/acref-9780198294818-e-1351

Myers. S. C. ( 2001 ) . Capital construction. Journal of Economic Perspective. Vol. 15. pp. 81-102.

Tsuji. C. ( 2012 ) A treatment on the signalling hypothesis of dividend poilcy. The Open Business Journal. 5. 1-7. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //benthamopen. com/tobj/articles/V005/1TOBJ. pdf


I'm Jerry

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out